What is a disadvantage of a two-man fighting hole?

The chosen answer highlights a significant concern regarding two-man fighting positions, specifically their ability to defend against aerial attacks, such as strafing. In a two-man fighting hole, the limited space and structure can lead to vulnerabilities against such threats. The close quarters can restrict the effectiveness of covering fire or returning fire, as the soldiers may have limited ability to reposition themselves or effectively engage targets in an aerial attack scenario. This poses a risk to the combatants when facing hostile aircraft, where more expansive and fortified positions might offer better cover and reduce the likelihood of collateral damage from gunfire or bombs.

In contrast, the other options illustrate different aspects of a two-man fighting hole. While it may provide some protection against artillery fire, the inherently limited cover offers less than what a larger fighting position would provide, but that's not the primary disadvantage focused on aerial threats. Likewise, the construction of the fighting hole itself may not require an inordinate amount of resources compared to larger structures, although it might not utilize space efficiently. Lastly, communication between soldiers in a two-man fighting hole is typically quite effective due to their proximity, making the limitation of communication an unlikely concern in this scenario. The focus on the susceptibility to strafing underscores the importance of evaluating all threats in a combat