Are strikes considered offensive operations aimed at damaging or destroying an objective for a political purpose?

Strikes are indeed classified as offensive operations with the primary goal of damaging or destroying specific objectives, particularly in the context of achieving strategic political aims. This is rooted in military doctrine where offensive operations are defined as actions taken to seize, retain, or exploit the initiative, resulting in the destruction of enemy capabilities or resources.

The emphasis on political purpose highlights that such operations are not only about immediate military gains but also about influencing the broader context of conflict. By targeting specific objectives, the intent is often to achieve psychological, political, or tactical advantages that support overarching military strategy or policy goals.

This understanding aligns with historical and contemporary military operations where strikes serve to impair the enemy's ability to wage war, affect public perception, or coerce political behavior, thereby reinforcing the notion that strikes are fundamentally offensive in nature and tied closely to political objectives.